Food and Body Image
...Bodies today have almost come to define the way our lives can be
lived. Without a body that girls feel all right about, nothing much
in their lives feels OK...All the normal difficulties of growing up,
dealing with conflicts, choices and angsts of adolescence, get
subsumed under a preoccupation to get one's body right...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
Orbach first published part one of
Fat is a Feminist Issue in
1978. Much of what she wrote back then is still very much applicable
to the current state of things regarding body image and women's
relationships with food.
Women's obsession with body image represents inequality between the
sexes; gaining weight can actually represent unconscious attempts to
gain size or power. Preoccupation with food and body image, or with
presenting an outer self acceptable or desirable to men, saps women's
energy, often leaving them with less (or no) energy for learning,
careers, changing the world, living.
I am curious as to how many people are uncomfortable regarding the
title of the book.
...Eating has become a psychological, moral, medical, aesthetic and
cultural statement...
...Fat is no longer an objective word meaning adipose tissue. It is a
word heavily laden with negative value and discomforting
emotions...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
Orbach said (many years ago) that rather than put the focus on the
'obesity epidemic' it is more important to look at the hidden problem
of troubled eating. She proposed a non-dieting and self-acceptance
approach. Modern eating disorder treatment usually revolves around a
similar focus. And yet diet centres continue to attract many clients,
new weight loss products continue to be marketed, new diet books are
published every year, and fad diets circulate around the internet.
Women compete with other women for the men who will:
legitimize their sexuality. This competition between women is
extremely fierce and painful even if only acted out on an unconscious
level. It makes us assess each other so we can feel comfortable or
uncomfortable when we engage with others...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
We are ranked by others, we rank others, and rank ourselves.
Orbach states that women's reasons for holding on to fat are largely
unconscious - it is her aim to bring these reasons to consciousness
so that they can be examined and dealt with. She asks:
Does the fat do what it is supposed to do?
For different people, the function of weight is different. For some
people, it might protect them from having to deal with sexual
intimacy. If a woman feels unattractive, she may send out signals to
that effect, and therefore not attract anyone. For some people,
eating may numb uncomfortable emotions, or even take the place of
sex.
In my case, I think when my weight is higher than I like it may be an
unconscious survival mechanism. I don't want to go out, because
unless I am 'doing all I can' to change what I can, I don't think I
'deserve' love. I have less chance than when thin to attract anyone.
If I am not thin and fit, I will have to face sexual rejection: I can
see that
no one finds me attractive. That is part of my
history that became a pattern: at age 17, after almost a year of not
leaving the house, I went outside for the summer. After a year of
receiving no feedback, being socially isolated, recovering from
family and personal trauma, and becoming something of a housewife, I
went outside and was not invisible. I received a lot of attention
regarding my appearance, and I was asked out continually. This was
not a healthy pattern, but it became firmly established. When I first
left the house again, I was not looking for attention, and had been
taken by surprise. After that experience, I learned how to attract
new social contacts in new surroundings where I had no connections -
but it depended on me putting in effort to become thin and
fit.
At present, it may still relate to sexual rejection: I can avoid
having to face sexual rejection if I never go outside. I don't have
to talk to new people about my (lack of) employment history, my
ichthyosis, or that I have HSV2. I don't have to face sexual
encounters in which others may be disgusted by certain angles of my
face up close, or certain parts of my body. Also, there is now the
additional factor of my age. And if I don't go outside, it is
difficult to plan a suicide. My eating/alcohol patterns keep me
subdued or preoccupied and prolong my life. I satisfy certain drives
(food/pleasure) as well as possible with as little as possible risk
to myself and my survival.
The 'fat' also keeps me in a state of perpetual self-loathing and
non-acceptance. Perhaps I have unconscious guilt, and am punishing
myself. [See:
guilt.]
But it seems to me that the 'fat' also probably has evolutionary
functions - and for some reason those are particularly difficult to
override. It may have something to do with my body type, and how it
was 'selected' more for endurance/ability to work than for aesthetic
reasons, and that now the focus is on aesthetics I am not able to
adapt - except periodically, in ways that might mimic the old pattern
of feast/famine. My body does seem able to handle extremes without
breaking down. (At age 44 I have never been hospitalized due to
complications related to an eating disorder, even though I have
experienced disordered eating now for 31 years.)
One problem I see - if people put the focus on non-dieting and self-
acceptance - is that often people will look at what they are
'supposed to do' now, and aim at in order to be 'good' or
'authentic', and while they honestly may wish to achieve it, it may
be more complicated than they realize. We now have tons of people all
repeating publicly that they achieved weight loss or their dream
relationship by aiming at 'health rather than appearance', and by
'finding out what I really wanted to do', and while these may be
valid steps, they may also give misleading impressions, and these
steps may still involve long years of hiding certain things from
oneself, about being influenced by what they think they 'should' do,
what society presently admires or rewards, and it may also give a
false idea about 'finality' - that there will not be an ongoing
discovery and readjustment, or more new relationships, or bad
relapses. People may need to tell themselves (and others) that they
are 'not dieting', when in fact they are, in part because there is
such enormous social and peer pressure (not to be silly, superficial,
or obsessed with one's appearance).
Many of the exercises Orbach recommended in
Fat is a Feminist
Issue (both I & II) I had tried on my own (or, more accurately,
had created my own similar exercises) in the past, without having
read her books. Also, at age 19 I had decided to stop weighing myself
because I had realized that I was too irrationally affected by the
number. I did not start again until my mid-30s, for a long time
instead going by how clothes fit.
This brings me to another important point: I don't think BMI (or
clothing size, for that matter) is a good indication of a person's
health, fitness or appearance. There is a lot of variation in bodily
structure, and just falling within an acceptable range does not give
an accurate idea.
There is part of me that argues that while many women are affected by
all the contradictory messages, many are never snowed under by them.
They live their lives, they accomplish things that are important to
them - they not only survive, they thrive. Is that only when women
more closely fit the ideal? I don't think fitting the ideal is any
guarantee of inner peace, but it may be true that the closer one is
to cultural ideals, the more likely one is to feel content, and for
others to treat one in ways that perpetuate the feelings of self- esteem.
Taking a stand against the norms, and choosing to be content
regardless would seem either to involve an almost religious disregard
for the influences of reality, or a very strong sense of self,
possibly supported in important ways by others. Once a person gets
the hang of finding such supports, it may become easier. It may be
possible to find effective ways of coping with others' outdated ways
of thinking and behaving by structuring one's life around the sources
and communities that reflect your own stance.
..to tell a compulsive eater to control something she feels is out
of her control has the effect of making her feel powerless and
guilty; powerless for being so ineffectual and guilty for whatever
food she does eat...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
This goes along with the 'official' stance: in order to lose weight,
you have to burn off more calories than you take in. You have to
take in fewer calories and/or exercise to the extent that there is a
deficit when it comes to daily expenditure. Doctors/professionals
usually focus in these terms, rather than on trying to understand
the person's individual makeup, physical and psychological, that
leads to weight gain. For the vast majority of people, weight loss
is still about willpower, positivity, and determination to make
positive lifestyle change.
If we all have a 'setpoint' weight that is determined by our genes,
and which our bodies will strive to maintain within a certain range,
how much control do we actually have? If we try to push our bodies
too far, will there always be a backlash, which results in
interference with the setpoint process, such that we gain back more
weight than before, and find it harder to take weight off?
Does the setpoint vary depending on one's circumstances? It would
seem that if setpoint is genetically determined, it would also be
programmed to respond differently in different circumstances. Are
there ways we can take advantage of, or simulate circumstances in
which our body would aim for the lower end of the setpoint range?
Without consciously realizing it, I think many of my own personal
experiments have been about trying to work this out. In my case, I
think that major change, e.g., moving from one country to another,
had an effect which lasted for a few years, in which it was not as
difficult to maintain a lower weight. However, over time, as I
stopped going out as much, it seemed to become more difficult again.
For me it seems that domesticity triggers the extra weight. This may
represent a connection with a nesting instinct.
After age 21, I stopped dieting. I refused to approach it in ways I
had in the past. At age 21, I had put in my very best effort to diet
as healthily as I knew how. I could not have tried harder. And yet,
I was not able to maintain my weight for long. In the years that
followed, I would not go back and try the same approach. I had some
time in which I was patient, in which I did a kind of meditation,
with a kind of focus that my body would find a weight on its own
that I could accept. Part of this process involved me giving up
makeup and hairstyling for a year.
I later spent years keeping food and exercise diaries.
In my mid-30s I began to try to diet again in the old way. By the
time I was 40, I was severely restricting calories when using that
approach, at times.
I have to respect anyone who can stand up to societal pressure, to
the competitive nature of life, and the comments of family and
friends that reinforce ideals of female beauty, and judge extra
weight as the result of sloth and lack of willpower and self-regard.
I seem unable to tackle the problem at the root: no matter what I've
read, or thought, or written over time, I have to admit that I can't
seem to get rid of the idea that I personally am not likely to
'deserve' love if I do not do what it is within my power to do, and I
am not really comfortable with other people - any people - as long as
I do not do it.
This very likely, in my case, has a lot to do with my status in life.
What I consider my work is not recognized as work. The effort I have
put in in thinking and expression is not recognized or commented on
as anything. It is not 'authentic' for me to 'think of others', help
others, become involved in helping with the environment or something
'worthwhile' in the eyes of society - I am already doing what it is
authentic for me to do. If I have anything to contribute, I am
already contributing it. And if that has no value to society or the
world, then I'm probably always going to have unresolvable issues
regarding self-esteem. I cannot just
decide that I am great as
I am. I am not an island. The way that I am perceived by others
affects how I see myself. Losing weight/becoming thin seems to be
the only thing within my power to 'earn' even a minor respect. The
rest of the time, it seems to make sense to protect myself from
having to deal with how I am judged.
As things stand, my personal stand is that I accept that my body
strives to be a certain weight. During those times, I prefer to
hibernate, to gain energy, to express what I can, and eventually
focus my energy in order to diet and exercise, such that I will have
a period of going more confidently out into the world. I want to end
the cycle, but I do not think it is realistic that I will ever
maintain at the weight I prefer. However, it
is better to
occasionally have periods in which I am thin/fit. The period of
preparation entails more 'hope' than an ongoing daily acceptance of
an unpleasant reality ever could, and the period of thinness/fitness
adds contrast to my life, which is necessary and an approximation of
pleasure.
I understand that this is about the underlying beliefs. I cannot just
make myself believe that every human being deserves love
regardless of shape and size. Or, they may deserve it, and I may be
able to see something lovable in more people than most people can,
but I don't think the reality is that just believing you deserve love
will bring love to you. I think we are going to find out that a lot
of what we call 'love' is really very much dependent upon appearance
and competition, and (when not naturally beautiful) those who try
hardest to compete may be the ones who 'earn' love.
What if you spend years trying out Orbach's exercises, and similar
ones, if you make every effort to address your possible unconscious
reasons for compulsive eating or extraneous weight, and after all
that still find that
honestly you do not really enjoy being a
weight that is natural or even considered healthy? And that it is
worth it to you to occasionally put in effort that will not have
long-term results, just so that you can have a bit of time in which
you escape your everyday self? Or do you think of yourself as a
'failure', that you have obviously not addressed all of your
unconscious issues and need to keep digging, and striving for a more
perfect self-honesty?
It is perhaps a 'kindness' to help women to come to accept themselves
in a harsh and judgmental world, a competitive world, but maybe that
kindness involves a kind of brainwashing or blindness which includes
an illusion of strength or surety. Reasons for weight gain or
inability to maintain at the weight we desire
might have more
to do with genetics and environmental factors than with our
unresolved psychological baggage, and it may be time that we
examine or learn about those possible influences.
We do not all
experience the same degree of difficulty when it comes to
maintaining a weight that is 'healthy' or that society rewards.
From a Freudian angle, I would think it would be about getting stuck
at the oral stage, and later about being unable to cope with the
adult sexual drive - which seems relevant in a society in which sex
is everywhere, but there are a lot of conflicting messages, there is
also danger (of death, disease, pregnancy), women are now expected to
be 'sexy' as well as beautiful, and possibly sexually skilled or at
least open, but still figuring out the line between that and 'slutty'
and be successful in traditionally male occupations while appearing
sexy - and advertising alternates between encouraging rewards for all
their hard work in the form of treats like chocolate, then makes them
feel guilty by advertising health products. Women's magazines which
attempt to give a healthy or realistic or feminist perspective
usually counteract their messages by having ads with opposite
messages on the same page or opposite page.
A long time ago, I thought the 'solution' was to try to be part of
a small alternative community. I had vague ideas that they existed in
most cities, and might be composed of artists and people involved in
various causes. I was never able to find such a place for myself or
take steps myself toward bringing a group together.
[it is not about willpower]:
...Fat is about protection, sex, nurturance, strength,
boundaries, mothering, substance, assertion and rage. It is a
response to the inequality of the sexes...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
Women are usually the ones who 'give' or nurture. Men have not been
taught how to do these things, and as a result women nurture
themselves with food.
...emphasis on presentation as the central aspect of a woman's
existence makes her extremely self-conscious...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
If you are fat, there is no way you can be seen as an ideal woman.
Women feel pressure to present an image to the world that will be
accepted and rewarded, as they are constantly observed and judged
regarding their appearance. Your appearance stands for your personal
qualities, tells others 'who' you are.
When appearance is given a primary importance, it is difficult to
avoid obsessing about it.
One of Orbach's suggestions is to wear clothing that is personally
expressive, no matter what your weight or size, rather than try
to wear the current styles and not to put off wearing something you
like until you are 'thin enough'.
Feelings may remain unexposed while a woman is fat.
A pattern of erratic caring can lead to a person treating
themselves similarly - e.g., a gorge/restrict pattern.
Fat may be a way to keep quiet about angry feelings related to those
who supposedly 'cared for' you.
When I was 16 and became a kind of 'mother' to my siblings, gaining
weight could have been a way of making myself unsexual, or sexually
unattractive, such that I would not end up pregnant with a family of
my own.
...Being fat serves the compulsive eater in a protective way; being
thin is a fearful state - the woman is exposed to the very things she
attempted to get away from when she got fat in the first
place...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
Once a person is thin, there may be a lot of pressure. If you look
like you 'have it together', you may be expected to act like you have
it all together. You may have to deal with the consequences of
sexual attraction and its results.
One of Orbach's important recommendations is that people imagine
the differences in scenes from their daily lives when thin as opposed
to fat - what aspects would change in what you wear, how you carry
yourself, how you communicate, how you are perceived, what is
expected of you.
I think there is a kind of social unspoken issue: a person who is
thin or emaciated is more 'entitled' to show neediness - there may be
a kind of respect that goes with the self-denial or discipline
necessary to become thin, thin people have 'earned' respect or the
right to have needs met - may evoke a 'protective' instinct in others -
people who are fat and needy are embarrassing, they lack self-control,
they are inappropriate, selfish, self-involved. And yet,
anorexia can be difficult to treat, and people do still makes jokes
about it that invalidate the experience of the sufferer. I think this
is representative of a significant issue: mixed messages. We all face
them in different ways. While striving for thinness, we may also have
unconscious negative attitudes about thinness. For example, my father
verbally associated thinness with physical weakness.
One thing I would like to suggest is that if a person is thin, more
people may see her in a sexual way, and flirt with her, and this may
increase her own sexual responsiveness.
If you diet a lot and don't keep the weight off, you can't trust that
your 'thin self' will be around long - the situation is precarious,
which is not conducive to self-confidence or self-trust.
People with food and weight issues do not identify hunger mechanisms
as readily as those without such issues as there are other meanings
to eating. To get free of dieting, we need to relearn actual hunger
cues/signals and figure out how to get past the idea that food is
something to be feared.
...The struggle to know what you want or need to eat changes the way
you respond to others' needs...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
There is a lot of stuff in the book about learning to distinguish
between actual hunger and emotional eating - trying to ask yourself
whether the emotional eating 'works', if it 'does what it is supposed
to do', or if there is some other activity that might address the
lack better. If it's about sexual repression, women have a dilemma:
our culture enforces the idea that it's best to have sex with love,
and supports the idea that if you haven't 'worked on' yourself
enough, you will not attract relationships that are good for you.
Also, if you lack confidence or somehow cannot attract a sexual
relationship, what should you realistically do? A vibrator does not
provide 'psycho-sexual release' - but I suppose men for a very long
time have had to masturbate when they can't find willing partners. If
the craving is for intimacy, or emotional interaction, and a person
has no close relationships, it may be difficult for the person to
find a solution.
In past agricultural societies the usual pattern was often one of
feast and fast.
There might be some genetic influence that exerts a strong pressure -
I wonder if certain genes increase pressure for the survival machine
to eat more when in certain circumstances - it may be partly a
response to plenty, or to advertising - but it could be that the
original 'code' specified that in certain circumstances it was
necessary to eat as much as possible - some people are more
susceptible to this than others, and it is extremely difficult to
reprogram this urge if circumstances remain the same. People with
genes that contribute strongly to this pressure would have greater
difficulty in using reason to overcome it.
Overeating occurs when a person feels unentitled to food and
consequently is always trying to stop herself from eating. This
self-denial goes hand in hand with its opposite, which is bingeing...
Susie Orbach, Fat is a Feminist Issue
Any time I try to actively lose weight, 'diet', I am aware it's not
for the long term. I do not trust my ability to maintain. In some
circumstances, I can maintain for some time, though. However, I look
forward to the idea of having a momentary reprieve from my everyday
condition. I create contrast between my normal life in which I feel
powerless/hopeless and the few moments I have 'earned' with a
possibility of pleasure. When I think back over my life, I could not
wish that I hadn't put in those efforts, and I cannot think they
were not 'worth it'. They add to the texture and richness of my life,
which otherwise would be a lot more flat, colourless. Maybe after
intense effort, there is also the 'release' of breakdown, which could
not be as pronounced if the effort hadn't been what it was. There is
a horror attached to the breakdown aspect, but I wonder if there
is not also some other psychological functions it fills.
It is useless to say that I have 'wasted' all my energy on this
process. I have tried a lot of the things the author suggests in this
book, plus more, and if I was going to find some kind of vocation or
lasting interests in life, I think I would have found them by now -
or I needed to be smarter, or more resourceful - things I could not
will myself to be. The reading and writing I have done this year
(2009-10) are just another example of my efforts to understand and
connect with the world in practical ways. There have been many
efforts which resulted in the alternative life which I now possess.
Many or most of the ideas I have encountered this year, I have
encountered before, and tried to make practical use of.
You can only change or attempt to change yourself - you cannot
control other people. One of the biggest issues is not advertising of
ideal images, but the pressures exerted by family and friends -
comments made about your appearance, and competitiveness whether
overt or unconscious - everyone is affected by the same concepts of
what is ideal, and many of the people you know will hold the opinions
or ideas that you are trying to escape from yourself. How does one
'educate' the others in one's life without preaching or judging, and
how does one retain a sense of balance or belief in oneself if the
others don't change their opinions - other than by distancing oneself
completely from these others?
...Her attempts to decorate herself are not cosmetic or ornamental,
but about disguise because she is disgusting, while she
accepts all male imperfections...
Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch
Women accept men's flaws, but not their own. As for myself, I think
my attempts to decorate myself
have been about toning down the
repulsiveness, but that they have also been about creativity and
attempts at self-expression. What I call 'face dancing' on my website
can actually be 'fun'. It's not one or the other, but a little of
both.
I don't think the solution is to focus in on men's flaws and put
pressure there. It seems to me that pointing to people's bodies
whatever their sex and calling attention to variations from the ideal
and calling those variations disgusting is unhealthy and
short-sighted.
See also: my thoughts regarding
cellulite and
vegetarianism.